So “hunter” becomes “huntress” and “enchanter” becomes “enchantress” So “aviator” becomes “aviatrix” and “administrator” becomes “administratrix” Unfortunately English, especially Americanized English, has a tendency to outright steal words from other languages so spelling in English isn’t as easy as some more orderly languages.
Are feminine nouns ending with -ess the only proper option for females?
- An “aviator” is a member of the crew of an aircraft.
- In most modern usage, ‘aviator’ is not typically heard much outside of academic settings, and is generally considered borderline archaic
- However, the use of the word “got” implies a more colloquial rendition, so I would not be totally against the non-comma version.
- So, generally the ending -ess means the feminine form.
- The -ment suffix is French, the -ion suffix is Latin, the -ing suffix is Germanic, and the -rix suffix is Celtic.
It would not necessarily be incorrect to include one or two commas in this list of adjectives (as either “long, straight, black hair” or “long, straight black hair”), but in this particular pin up aviator login situation, it is largely a matter of personal stylistic preference. There are a huge number of alternative noun phrases for this sense, based on what terminology is used for the spacecraft in question (for example ‘shuttle pilot’). This is because both “long”, “straight”, and “black” apply to the noun “hair” equally, regardless of order. In more technical terms, commas are used between two or more “coordinate” adjectives that modify the same noun–“co-ordinate” in that they equally/independently modify the noun. The general rule is that commas should be used to separate two or more adjectives that independently modify a noun. (1) Does the sentence still make sense if the word “and” is inserted between the two adjectives in question?
Guess I’m just ‘old fashioned’. That having been said, I find a certain charm to gender specific terms. Note also that there is a tendency towards using one word for all genders. But for any given word, the only way to tell whether such a feminized version exists is to look it up in the dictionary. As with most things in English, no, there isn’t a general rule. Personally I like the two comma version the best, of the ones given.
- The word “pilot” can also refer to a person who directs a ship or boat, or figuratively who directs anything.
- For example feminine from waiter is waitress, from actor – actress, etc.
- I, personally, would assume the suffix ess fits well with titles given to a person of nobility.
- So “hunter” becomes “huntress” and “enchanter” becomes “enchantress”
- Unfortunately English, especially Americanized English, has a tendency to outright steal words from other languages so spelling in English isn’t as easy as some more orderly languages.
- Is it always wrong to use, like, hunter for a female hunter too or sorcerer for a female sorcerer too and so on?
Is there a general rule how to create feminine words?
I agree that “aviator” is a bit more old-fashioned. “A pilot” is a person qualified to assume such a role, or a person who frequently does so. All of those directly responsible (in the air) for keeping an aircraft flying as intended.
Similarly, in the expression a Greek Orthodox priest, “Greek Orthodox” forms a unit that we cannot separate or change the order of; so no comma can be used between “Greek” and “Orthodox.” So here the adjectives are independently modifying the noun (that is to say, they are coordinate adjectives), which means that using a comma is correct. (2) Does the sentence still make sense if the order of the adjectives in question is switched? In American English today, I normally hear the term aviator used to describe either someone who made a significant contribution to the field of aviation, or a military pilot (particularly “Naval aviator” or “Marine aviator,” since members of the U.S. Air Force are “airmen” instead).
What is the type of movement of hot-air balloons called in English?
Many suffixes get the same meaning,such as development,oppression,their suffixes both mean state,so how do I choose the right suffix without dictionary. Lioness is the female lion. I, personally, would assume the suffix ess fits well with titles given to a person of nobility. Here’s my understanding of the suffix ess. People would normally attempt to use, if possible, a genderless word so as not to cause possible offence, It isn’t that important, and some words can’t be feminised, such as the ones mentioned in the question.
Is there a general rule how to create feminine words?
There are a number of words you can choose here. First is “-trix” Best examples I can think of would be aviator/aviatrix and dominator/dominatrix. If they don’t, then they use the male noun for both genders. Idiomatic means that there is no firm grammar rule and you have to learn each one on a case-by-case basis.
An “aviator” is a member of the crew of an aircraft. The word “pilot” can also refer to a person who directs a ship or boat, or figuratively who directs anything. “The pilot” is the person in direct chrage of flying the aircraft. Aviator is now a more old fashioned term for pilot.
What is the type of movement of hot-air balloons called in English?
Some words in -er have feminine counterparts in -ress.1 And most words that end with -man can be feminized by changing it to -woman. Is there a rule by which a native speaker would create feminine forms? Is there a general rule how to create feminine words? I would leave out the redundant “got” and just say “I have long, straight, black hair.” Coordinating adjectives, which these are, should be separated by commas.
When it needs to be unambiguous, this sense is usually called a ‘ship pilot’ or ‘maritime pilot’. In the past, the term ‘aviator’ could be applied to the pilot, the navigator, or the flight engineer. There are no rules for learning them without just learning each word as you discover it.
Are feminine nouns ending with -ess the only proper option for females?
Does it always work like in the emperor and empress case, where the gender is somehow clearly distinct (at least for me) ? Is it always wrong to use, like, hunter for a female hunter too or sorcerer for a female sorcerer too and so on? Find the answer to your question by asking. It is, however, rare to hear people in the third category referred to as “aviators.” They meet the dictionary definition, and Wikipedia includes them, but in a separate list at the bottom of the page because they get in on a technicality. In most modern usage, ‘aviator’ is not typically heard much outside of academic settings, and is generally considered borderline archaic ‘Aviator’ is anybody operating an aircraft.
So, generally the ending -ess means the feminine form. For example feminine from waiter is waitress, from actor – actress, etc. However, the use of the word “got” implies a more colloquial rendition, so I would not be totally against the non-comma version. In such a simple, unambiguous sentence it’s almost more readable without the commas though. With or without the commas, it’s unambiguous and completely understandable.
If it would require an “and” to clarify the meaning, then a comma is needed. We cannot separate “mobile” from “phone” because the “mobile phone” forms a unit that “new” is modifying. The sentence would still make sense if we switched it to either The aviator took the controls and navigated the balloon through the storm. The aviator took the controls and flew the balloon through the storm.
An ‘aviator’ and a ‘pilot’ both refer to someone who can fly a plane. The -ment suffix is French, the -ion suffix is Latin, the -ing suffix is Germanic, and the -rix suffix is Celtic. See similar questions with these tags. I, personally, wouldn’t feminize any words that are gender neutral. The word actor is a gender neutral word that defines an occupation. So “lion” becomes “lioness” and “author” becomes “authoress”
